Publishing in High Ranked Journals: A Beginner's Guide

--- **Overall Course Rating:** 4.85 out of 5 stars ### **Course Review Summary** The course on Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Publishing in High Ranked Journals has received largely positive feedback from recent reviewers, with a few suggestions for improvement. The majority of the reviews commend Dr. Shakil Ahmad for his mastery of the subject matter and the practical value the course provides to researchers, particularly those working towards their Doctoral Thesis. **Pros:** - **Expertise of Instructor (Dr. Shakil Ahmad):** Reviewers highlight the instructor's deep understanding of the topics covered, praising his ability to deliver the content effectively. - **Confidence Boost for Researchers:** Participants express that the course has increased their confidence in conducting SLR and in publishing their research. - **Practical Application:** The course is considered highly beneficial for practical application in one's research career, with immediate utility for those working on their doctoral thesis. - **Comprehensive Coverage:** The course is regarded as a complete guide to conducting SLR and understanding the publishing process, especially in terms of finding suitable journals and utilizing Elsevier tools. - **Highly Recommended:** Many reviewers recommend this course to other research scholars and graduate students for its informative content and practical tips. - **Lifehacks for Publications:** The lessons provided are lauded for their lifehacks that help improve the clarity and quality of research publications. **Cons:** - **Outdated Information:** Some reviewers suggest updating the course contents to include more recent information, particularly in relation to journal research and selection using Elsevier tools. - **Technical Issues:** There are reports of some links within the course not functioning properly, which need to be addressed. - **Presentation Style:** The voice on slides is described as "boring," with a recommendation to upload video lectures instead for a more engaging learning experience. - **Content Retention:** A couple of reviewers mention missing important points after reviewing the same video lectures multiple times, indicating that the content may be too dense or that viewers might benefit from additional learning aids such as summaries or visual recaps. **Personal Experiences and Gratitude:** - Reviewers express gratitude towards Dr. Shakil Ahmad for providing valuable insights into the peer-review process and for the overall positive impact on their research journey. - Several reviewers share personal experiences of how the course has been instrumental in overcoming past challenges with publication clarity and quality. ### **Final Verdict:** The course stands out as a highly valuable educational resource, particularly for early-career researchers and students. The positive feedback significantly outweighs the minor criticisms, suggesting that with some content updates and improvements to presentation methods, this course could be close to perfect. The course is indeed a real deal for the money spent and represents an excellent investment in one's own professional development. --- **Note:** If you are considering taking this course, it may be beneficial to reach out to the instructor or platform support for clarification on whether updates have been made based on these reviews. Additionally, expressing your preference for video lectures over voice on slides could influence your learning experience positively.