Ethical Hacking Crash Course

🏅 **Course Review Summary** **Overall Rating:** 2.75/5 ### Pros - **Ethical Hacking Basics Covered:** The course provides a foundational understanding of basic ethical hacking techniques such as DOS attacks and hiding data in images. ### Cons - **Poor Audio Quality:** Many reviewers reported that the instructor's voice was either too low, difficult to understand, or comparable to noise, making it hard to hear the content. - **Lack of Practical Examples and Interactivity:** Several users pointed out that there were no practical examples as advertised and a lack of interactive teaching elements. The course did not live up to its name "Learn Hacking Practically." - **Inadequate Explanations and Presentation:** Reviewers noted that there were no clear explanations, poor presentation of knowledge, and some even mentioned that it seemed like the instructor was reading from a script without enthusiasm. - **Language Clarity and Content Terminology:** The language used in the course was unclear, and the content consisted mainly of terminologies that could be found on Google, without deeper insights or explanations. - **Misleading Course Description:** The course description was considered misleading as it did not accurately reflect the content and practicality of the course. - **Subpar Visual Aids and Slides:** There were complaints about the lack of visual aids, with slides being too less to effectively support learning. - **Accent and Pronunciation Issues:** The instructor's accent was difficult for some students to comprehend, which affected their understanding of the material. - **No Practical Application:** The course failed to provide any practical application or real-world examples as promised, leaving learners without the hands-on experience they were expecting. - **Inadequate Response to Feedback:** Despite the feedback on audio quality and clarity of content, there was no indication that the instructor made efforts to improve these aspects. **Final Verdict:** The course "Learn Hacking Practically" receives a mixed response from students due to significant issues with audio quality, lack of practical application, inadequate presentation, and misleading descriptions. While it may offer some foundational knowledge, these drawbacks significantly detract from the learning experience. It is recommended that the course be revised to address these concerns for a more effective educational offering.