Scaled Scrum - Nexus - Certification Practice Exams

🌟 SPS - Scaled Professional Scrum - Nexus Certification Practice Exams: Your Path to Mastery! 🌟

---

Course Overview

All the practice exams are based on the latest Nexus and ScrumGuide standards. These UNOFFICIAL practice tests are meticulously crafted to provide you with a comprehensive review of the Scaled Professional Scrum (SPS) and Nexus Framework, essential for your certification journey.

What You Get:

• 240 Questions: Dive into 6 full-length practice exams, each comprising 40 multiple-choice questions, all in English to enhance your understanding of Scaled Scrum concepts.

• Expert Explanations: Each question comes with a detailed explanation, designed to deepen your insight into the Scaled Scrum framework and the nuances of the Nexus Framework, including its rules, roles, events, artifacts, and transparency around the Definition of Done (DoD).

Focus Areas of the Practice Exams:

📈 Application of Nexus

• Analyze and apply Nexus to complex situations and large software development efforts.

🧩 Nexus Framework

• Understand the core components of Nexus, including its Rules, Roles, Events, Artifacts, and its role as the exoskeleton of Scaled Scrum.

🔗 Scaling Framework

• Gain a solid grasp of how to scale Scrum effectively, with an emphasis on understanding the foundational principles, values, and the pursuit of technical excellence.

Key Elements of Nexus:

👥 Nexus Roles

• Learn about the Nexus Integration Team, including the Product Owner in Nexus Integration Team (PO), Scrum Master in Nexus Integration Team (SM), and Nexus Integration Team Members.

⏱️ Nexus Events

• Familiarize yourself with Refinement, Nexus Sprint Planning, Nexus Sprint Goal, Nexus Daily Scrum, Nexus Sprint Review, and Nexus Sprint Retrospective.

📊 Artifacts

• Understand the Product Backlog (PB), Nexus Sprint Backlog (SB), and Integrated Increment, along with the significance of Artifact Transparency through the Definition of Done (DoD).

Course Highlights:

• 100% Money-Back Guarantee: Your satisfaction is guaranteed. If you're not satisfied with the course for any reason, you can claim a full refund within 30 days of your purchase.

Legal Disclaimer:

These UNOFFICIAL practice tests are not endorsed by, nor in partnership, nor affiliated with Scrum . org. The statements made and opinions expressed herein belong exclusively to the course creator and do not represent the viewpoint of Scrum . org.

Scrum . org makes no representations, warranties or assurances of any kind, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, availability, or currency of the content contained in this presentation or any material related to this presentation. Any reliance you place on such content is strictly at your own risk.

---

Trademark Notice Statement

The terms Scrum Open, Professional Scrum™, Professional Scrum Master™, Professional Scrum Product Owner™, PSM, PSM I, PSM II, PSPO, PSPO I, PSPO II, PSD, SPS, etc., are the protected brands of Scrum Organization.

The practice tests use wording from the Scrum Guide™, Nexus Guide™, and Evidence-Based Management Guide™ to explain important concepts, ideas, rules, and practices. No changes have been made to the content of the Scrum Guide™, Nexus Guide™, or Evidence-Based Management Guide™.

---

License:

This content is available under an Attribution Share-Alike license of Creative Commons. We encourage you to share and use this material as a learning tool to enhance your understanding and preparation for the SPS certification.

---

Ready to conquer Scaled Scrum? Let's embark on this journey together! 🚀✨

---

Overall Course Rating: 4.30

Course Review:

Pros:

• Effective Practice: The course provides practice questions that can help students prepare for exams, as noted by one student who achieved a high score after using the course materials. (Reviewer 2)
• Responsive Support: Technical issues were promptly addressed by Tech Agilist, indicating good customer service and responsiveness to feedback. (Reviewer 4)
• Comprehensive Content: A substantial amount of content is included, which is beneficial for learners who are able to complement the missing topics with additional research or experience. (Reviewer 3)

Cons:

• Question and Answer Clarity: Many questions and answers are confusing due to poor formulation and frequent spelling errors. The language used often appears to have been translated, making it difficult for non-native speakers to understand. (Reviewer 1)
• Inconsistent Design Choices: The course design includes inconsistent bolding in questions and answer options, which can be visually distracting and detract from the learning experience. (Reviewer 1)
• Outdated Content: The majority of content is based on an older guide, and the course lacks updates to reflect current practices and examples. This makes the course less relevant for learners seeking up-to-date information. (Reviewer 3)
• Incomplete Topics: Several key topics are missing or insufficiently covered, limiting the usefulness of the course. Areas such as Cross team refinement examples, Risky PBIs with interdependencies, Sprint planning detailed ownership, DevOps cake, and scenario-based questions are notably absent or inadequately addressed. (Reviewer 4)
• Question Accuracy: Some practice questions and answers provided within the course are incorrect or formulated in an unusual manner, which can lead to confusion and hinder learning. (Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 4)

Recommendation for Improvement: To improve the course rating, the following actions are recommended:

• Content Update: Revise all content to reflect the most current guide and include missing topics such as those mentioned by Reviewer 4.
• Editorial Review: Conduct a thorough review of all questions and answers to correct spelling errors, clarify confusing phrasing, and ensure the accuracy of the information provided.
• Design Improvement: Standardize the design elements within the course to improve readability and learning engagement.

Final Thoughts: While there are areas where the course excels, particularly in providing practice questions that can aid in exam preparation, significant improvements are needed to address the current shortcomings. The course has the potential to be a valuable resource with targeted updates and editorial refinements. (Review synthesized from all provided reviews)