Основы работы с Git, GitHub и GitHub Actions

👒 **Overall Course Review** **Pros:** - **Comprehensive Understanding**: The course provides a clear and structured understanding of the topic, with key concepts well-articulated, allowing for further exploration and learning. - **Real-World Application**: The information presented is practical and can be applied immediately by beginners to their work. - **Engaging Style**: Despite some criticism regarding speech, the author's lively delivery was found to add a human touch that could make the content more enjoyable for some learners. - **Final Series Clarity**: The final series of the course helps clarify questions and solidifies understanding of the overall concept. - **Versatility**: The course caters to different types of learners, from those familiar with the language to others who prefer different learning materials. - **Academic Acknowledgement**: Some reviewers appreciate the academic approach to teaching and feel it is suitable for an educational platform. **Cons:** - **Language and Slang**: The course uses a lot of slang and colloquial language which might be challenging or off-putting for some learners, particularly in an academic context. - **Pedagogical Approach**: The explanatory style is informal, with many superfluous words that could be distracting to the core content for a course on a professional platform. - **Example Relevance**: Some reviewers felt that the artificial examples used were not representative of real-life scenarios, especially concerning personal GitHub accounts. - **Audience Assumption**: There is an assumption that some audience members might already have a basic understanding of the subject matter. - **Lack of Foundational References**: For beginners starting from scratch, additional references or explanations on fundamental concepts such as ansible and docker could be beneficial. - **Clarity in Early Content**: Some found the early content, particularly before the final series, to lack clarity and were left wondering about the practical relevance of the actions described. - **Code Review Emphasis**: A few reviewers pointed out that emphasis on code review in the later part of the course would have been helpful earlier on, as it was crucial for understanding the overall workflow. **Additional Notes:** - The course received positive feedback for its ability to demystify the subject matter and make it accessible to beginners. - The use of contemporary language and slang could be seen as relatable to a younger audience but may require a more formal approach for broader acceptance on an educational platform. - The course's final series is highly praised for bringing clarity and tying all the learned concepts together. - The author's unique delivery style and sense of humor were appreciated by some learners, adding a personal touch to the instructional content. **Conclusion:** The course presents a valuable introduction to the subject matter, with its strengths lying in its ability to convey complex ideas simply and its engaging final series. However, it could benefit from refining its language to better fit an educational platform's audience and incorporating more foundational references for beginners. Despite some drawbacks in presentation style, the course remains a solid starting point for understanding the essentials of the topic at hand.