Prepare the Safe 5.0 Leading Safe certificate

🌟 Prepare to Lead with Agility: Your Journey to SAFe 5 SA (SAFE Agilist) Certification! 🌟

About the Course:

These practice exams are neither endorsed by, nor in partnership, nor affiliated with SAFe.

Why Take This Course?

This comprehensive course is meticulously designed to help you prepare for the SAFE 5 SA (SAFE Agilist) certification. It is crafted for individuals aspiring to lead a Lean-Agile transformation at scale, ensuring teams and leaders are well-versed in the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe).

What You Will Gain:

Exam Details:

This course prepares you for the SAFE 5 Leading safe Exam:

• The simulation test features 20 to 30 questions, to be completed within 60 minutes.
• Aim for a passing score of 77% or higher.
• The practice questions are carefully crafted to align with the actual SAFE 5 Leading safe Exam.
• For any inquiries regarding the exam or test questions, feel free to contact the author directly.
• Ensure you have read through the Scrum Guide on Scrum (dot) Org, and familiarize yourself with the Scaled Agile Framework on SAFe™ for Testers (dot) com.
• This is an intermediary course; you should have experience with the Scrum Framework, and ideally, have served as a Scrum Master.

After Passing the Exam:

Hi [Your Name],

We’ve provided a breakdown of your scores in each section to highlight your strengths across the SAFe 5 upgrade areas:

Now, you're ready to showcase your achievement by studying the key sections and embarking on your Lean-Agile leadership journey.

Key Sections to Study:

Before taking the exam, make sure to thoroughly review these essential areas:

Embark on your SAFe journey today and become a certified leader in the world of Agile transformations! 🚀📚🏆

📚 Course Review Summary

Overall Rating: 3.85/5

Pros:

• The practice questions are helpful for learning and were effective for one learner who passed the exam with a high score. (Positive Review)
• A diverse range of questions is available, which can be beneficial for comprehensive study preparation.
• The question bank is well-designed and caters to the need for exam preparation. (Positive Review)
• Some users found the collection of questions to be good and useful for identifying areas in need of further study. (Positive Review)
• A few users appreciated the good organization of content and found it helpful in preparing for their examinations. One user rated it as a "Five Star" experience. (Positive Review)

Cons:

• Several reviews highlighted significant issues with incorrect answers provided within the course materials, which undermines the course's reliability.
• The lack of comprehensive explanations for both the questions and the correct answers led to confusion among learners. Some users expected more than just limited explanations and adequate justifications for answers.
• Inconsistent grammar and syntax errors in the questions made them difficult to understand, which could potentially lead to misunderstandings or incorrect interpretations of the material.
• The absence of theoretical content was a concern for some users who felt the course lacked depth and relied too heavily on test questions without contextual understanding.
• Some users pointed out repetitive questions and a limited number of questions given the course price, suggesting that it might not offer value for money.
• A few reviews indicated that the course did not fulfill its purpose, as some learners felt they were wasting their time and money on a subpar educational experience.
• The course's content, particularly in terms of grammar, was described as shocking and unacceptable for an online learning platform like Udemy.
• The lack of proper explanations or links to additional information for answers was noted, which could hinder the learning process.
• At least one user requested a refund due to the poor quality of the course's content and the presence of incorrect and confusing questions.

Course Content:

• Questions primarily from Quizlet.com, with varying levels of clarity and accuracy.
• Limited explanation of concepts and ideas, necessitating additional research or study outside the course materials.
• Some theoretical context is present but not sufficient to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.
• The course does not appear to have undergone thorough editing for grammar and clarity, which affects the usability of the questions.

Recommendation: The course offers some valuable practice questions but falls short in several critical areas, including accuracy, comprehensiveness, and instructional design. Learners should approach this course with caution, supplementing the practice questions with additional research and study to ensure a thorough understanding of the subject matter. It is recommended that the course creators address the issues raised by users, particularly concerning grammar, clarity, and the inclusion of incorrect answers, to improve the course's overall value.