Modern C++ Concurrency in Depth ( C++17/20)

📚 **Global Course Rating: 4.27** ### Course Overview and Content Quality #### Pros: - 🎓 **Comprehensive Topics Coverage:** The course covers a wide range of concurrency topics, from basic to advanced levels, making it a valuable resource for both novice and experienced programmers. - 🤖 **Advanced Content:** Some users found the content to be very advanced and detailed, especially in areas like atomic operations and lock-free programming. - 🌍 **C++17 and C++20 Updates:** The course is updated to cover C++17 and C++20 features, which are important for modern C++ concurrency programming. - 📚 **Alignment with Existing Literature:** Some users appreciated the alignment of the course content with the book "Concurrency in Action" by Anthony Williams, even if it was not always clearly mentioned. - 👍 **Explained Well:** A number of reviews praised the clear explanations provided by the instructors, especially for complex concepts. - 💎 **Valuable Depth of Information:** The depth of information provided in some lectures was noted as particularly impressive, offering insights into how things work under the hood. #### Cons: - 🚫 **Lack of Beginner-Friendly Approach:** The course seems to be more geared towards those with prior knowledge of concurrency and multiprocessing. - 🚧 **Confusing Content Rush:** Some users found the content from section 4 onwards to be rushed, with topics not being discussed in depth. - ✏️ **Outdated Slides and Code Examples:** Some slides were outdated, and some code examples provided in later sections did not correspond to the lectures they were supposed to support (e.g., sections 6 and 9). Additionally, codes for certain lectures (e.g., lectures 85 and 86) were reported as non-working. - 🗣️ **Speech Clarity and English Grammar Issues:** Some users noted that speech clarity and English grammar in the course needed improvement. This affected the understanding of the material, with some instructors being more clear than others. - 📄 **Missing Assignments:** The absence of assignments or tasks to help understand the topics was pointed out as a significant gap in the course's comprehensive approach. - 🛠️ **Technical Errors and Oversights:** There were reports of technical errors, such as missing code snippets and incorrect information within slides. ### Instructor Performance and Course Structure - 🧑‍🏫 **Different Presenters:** The course appears to have content delivered by different presenters, with some users preferring the main instructor over others. - ♫ **Audio and Presentation Quality:** Some users suggested that the material could be made more professional in terms of audio quality and presentation to match the complexity and importance of the subject matter. ### Course Material and Supporting Resources - 📑 **Missing Materials:** Several reviews highlighted issues with missing materials, such as slides and code snippets, which required transcribing from video to understand certain concepts. - 🖥️ **Video and Slide Discrepancies:** In some instances, the content presented in videos contradicted what was shown on slides, which was found to be very distracting. ### User Experience and Learning Outcome - ✨ **Learning Value:** Despite the issues with presentation and content consistency, users reported gaining valuable knowledge about concurrency in C++ that improved their programming skills. - 🔁 **Room for Improvement:** Users provided constructive feedback, suggesting improvements such as better English grammar, more comprehensive coverage of topics, and the inclusion of assignments or tasks to aid learning. ### Conclusion The course is highly praised for its extensive coverage of concurrency topics in C++ but falls short in delivering a seamless and error-free learning experience due to presentation issues, inconsistencies in material quality, and some technical oversights. It is recommended for those with a background in concurrency who wish to update their skills to C++17/C++20 standards, but it may require additional effort to navigate the course content effectively. A potential rework of the course with attention to detail, clarity, and thoroughness could significantly enhance its value as a learning tool.