Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer (CLAD) Practice Exams

As per the latest CLAD Topics

4.00 (57 reviews)

Udemy

platform

English

language

Programming Languages

What you will learn

National Instruments-Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer (CLAD) Practice Exams for 2020

Why take this course?

The practice tests cover all three domains as per the latest CLAD-2017 preparation guide. Namely

Hardware (10% of exam questions)
LabVIEW Programming Environment (25% of exam questions)
LabVIEW Programming Fundamentals (50% of exam questions)
Programming Best Practices (15% of exam questions)

What's included in this practice exam

There are 6 practice exams with 345 unique questions.
Practice exams follow the official blueprint and topic areas.
You can take the test as many times as you like.
You can pause the test at any time and resume later.
If time runs out, you can still complete the test.
After completing the test, you will see the result immediately.

Content

Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer Exam Practice Exam-6

Reviews

Sajed

April 15, 2023

Instructor could improve by doing a much better job of providing explanation for all answers (or as applicable). Some questions have just correct answers but no explanation. An explanation in such cases would be helpful. I am halfway through this course and still not very impressed. Is the current material still relevant and sufficient for passing the CLAD exam in 2023?

Alexander

October 26, 2021

Unfortunately, the content of this course will not give you enough knowledge to pass the current CLAD exam.

Liban

September 13, 2020

content were not original, you can find all these training just use google pissed i wasted my money and time on this Scam

Roy

August 17, 2020

Started with little LabVIEW knowledge and was able to get certification in 4 weeks. Thank you so much

Eric

June 9, 2020

These questions are really similar to the practice exams you can get from National Instruments website. I also felt there were answers that I got wrong that absolutely should have been right, and some ambiguous ones open to interpretation.