Product Management+Agile Requirements using Product Backlog

👑 **Course Overview** The course has received a global rating of 4.60, with all recent reviews being positive. The majority of feedback suggests that the course provides a clear understanding of product vision and the need for a product backlog, as well as practical tips for managing a Product Backlog. However, several areas for improvement have been noted, particularly in terms of delivery pace, visual representation, and the inclusion of downloadable reference materials. 🛠️ **Pros** - **Clear Understanding**: Many reviewers found the course helpful in understanding product management concepts and best practices. - **Useful Tips**: Instructors provided valuable tips and real-world examples that were appreciated by learners, especially those new to product management or Agile environments. - **Practical Application**: The inclusion of exercises was highlighted as particularly useful, allowing learners to apply what they learned directly. - **Consistency with Standards**: The course is consistent with the Scrum Body of Knowledge (SBOK) and other certification courses, which is beneficial for those seeking consistency in their training. - **Well-Prepared Content**: The scripts or presentation slides were well-prepared, which was noted by some learners as a positive aspect of the course. - **Language and Accessibility**: Some users appreciated the inclusion of subtitles or the clear language used throughout the course, which aided in comprehension. 🔄 **Cons** - **Delivery Pace**: The pace at which information was delivered was too fast for some learners, who found themselves rewinding frequently to absorb the content. - **Lack of Visuals**: The absence of sufficient visual aids was a common complaint, with learners stating that more visual examples and slides would improve retention. - **Complex Jargon**: Some reviewers felt that the course used jargon or acronyms without adequate explanation, which could be confusing for newcomers. - **Distracting Presentation Style**: The combination of a live person reading slides with an animated series in a different narrator style was perceived as disjointed and potentially distracting. - **Need for Practical Examples**: A few users indicated that more real-world examples, especially for sprint planning meetings and using tools like Jira Scrum Board, would be beneficial. - **Fundamental Nature**: Some learners found the course too fundamental and were seeking more profound details, particularly on backlog refinement methods. 📚 **Suggestions for Improvement** - **Slow Down**: Adjusting the delivery pace to allow for better comprehension could enhance the learning experience. - **Visual Aids**: Incorporating more visual aids, such as slides with text or animations that complement the spoken content, would aid in learner retention. - **Downloadable Materials**: Providing reference materials for learners to download and review at their own pace could add significant value. - **Practical Exercises**: Expanding on the exercises provided and perhaps adding a real small project case study throughout the course would offer a more hands-on experience. - **Consistent Quality**: Ensuring a consistent quality of information and presentation across all segments of the course could improve learner engagement. 💡 **Final Thoughts** Overall, the course is highly regarded for its educational content and practical tips, particularly for those new to or preparing for roles related to Scrum and Product Ownership. By addressing the identified areas for improvement, the course could provide an even more comprehensive and effective learning experience for users at all levels of understanding.